Microsoft's Massive Layoffs: How Did This Happen?

AI generateth, humans revieweth.

The tech industry's layoff spree continues, and Microsoft's latest round of cuts has left many scratching their heads. Despite being one of the world's most profitable companies with a market cap hovering around $3 trillion, Microsoft announced another 9,000 layoffs, bringing their total cuts for the year to 15,000 employees. This move has sparked intense debate about corporate priorities, industry sustainability, and the hidden costs of popular gaming subscription models.

The Gaming Division Under Fire

The irony isn't lost on industry observers: many of these layoffs are concentrated in Microsoft's gaming division, the very area that was supposed to benefit from the company's massive Activision Blizzard acquisition. Remember when Microsoft assured regulators that the companies would remain independent and no overlapping positions would be eliminated? That promise has aged poorly.

"If you're a gamer, if you're someone who cares about this, from the consumption side, it's been a really bad acquisition," noted Nicholas de Leon, Consumer Reports' senior electronics reporter, during a recent discussion on This Week in Tech. The evidence is hard to ignore: beloved studios like Arkane Studios have been shuttered, highly anticipated games have been canceled, and even projects that "wowed executives" are being axed.

The Game Pass Dilemma

At the heart of this controversy lies Game Pass, Microsoft's "Netflix for games" subscription service. For $20 monthly, subscribers get access to a vast library of games instead of paying $60 per title. It sounds like a great deal for consumers, but industry insiders are increasingly questioning whether it's sustainable for developers.

"The question now is, are these game studios structured in a way where they're going to get paid properly?" de Leon wondered. Unlike Spotify's complex payment system for artists, Microsoft has never clearly explained how Game Pass revenue is distributed to studios and publishers. This opacity has led to growing concerns that the math simply doesn't work.

Game studios that once relied on direct sales at $60 per copy are now dependent on mysterious "ethereal Game Pass kickbacks from Microsoft." As de Leon put it, "the math isn't mathing, as the kids say."

Industry Veterans Sound the Alarm

The criticism isn't coming from casual observers. One of the co-founders of Arkane Studios, the team behind the acclaimed game Dishonored, publicly questioned whether Game Pass is sustainable. This represents a significant shift in industry sentiment, with developers who were once cautiously optimistic about subscription models now expressing serious doubts.

Even Phil Spencer, CEO of Microsoft Gaming, is facing unprecedented scrutiny. Despite his reputation as being "gamer-friendly," critics are asking what tangible benefits his decade-long tenure has produced beyond studio closures and game cancellations.

The Broader Economic Picture

Host Leo Laporte raised a crucial question during the discussion: "What's with the layoffs at Microsoft, which is arguably one of the most profitable companies in the world?" The answer might lie in changes to the tax code that went into effect in 2022.

Previously, companies could spread R&D expenses (including programmer salaries) over five years. Now they must deduct these costs in a single year, creating a significant tax burden. This change, part of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, has been cited as a potential driver of the widespread tech layoffs we've seen since 2022.

The Human Cost of Corporate Strategy

Attorney Cathy Gellis, who joined the podcast discussion, highlighted the human impact of these decisions. "When the company is so profitable, it does feel very weird," she observed about the disconnect between Microsoft's financial success and its employment practices.

The layoffs represent more than just numbers on a spreadsheet. They're experienced developers, artists, and designers who've spent years crafting games that millions of players love. When studios are shuttered and projects canceled, it's not just jobs that are lost, since the creative potential and cultural artifacts disappear forever.

Looking Forward: An Industry in Crisis?

The gaming industry faces a perfect storm of challenges. Development costs have skyrocketed, with some games requiring hundreds of employees working for a decade at costs reaching hundreds of millions of dollars. Meanwhile, younger consumers are gravitating toward free-to-play games like Fortnite, reducing demand for traditional $60 releases.

"People are just not, especially younger people, are not buying new games at the rate they were," de Leon noted. Why purchase new games when you can play with friends for free in established live-service games?

This shift in consumer behavior, combined with the unclear economics of subscription services and changing tax policies, has created an unsustainable situation for many studios. The question isn't whether more layoffs are coming; it's how the industry will adapt to survive.

Beyond the immediate economic concerns lies a deeper cultural issue. As Gellis pointed out, video games are cultural artifacts that deserve preservation, much like films from the 1920s that we still watch today. However, current copyright laws make it nearly impossible to preserve games for future generations, and the industry's focus on live-service models means many games simply disappear when servers shut down.

"This is a part of our culture and it should be archivable," Gellis argued, highlighting another dimension of the industry's sustainability crisis.

A Call for Transparency

The Microsoft layoffs and Game Pass controversy underscore a broader need for transparency in the gaming industry. Publishers need to clearly explain how revenue-sharing works in subscription models. Regulators should scrutinize merger promises more carefully. And perhaps most importantly, the industry needs to have an honest conversation about what constitutes a sustainable business model.

As the dust settles on another round of layoffs, one thing is clear: the gaming industry's current trajectory is unsustainable. Whether the solution lies in smaller development teams, transparent revenue sharing, or new business models entirely remains to be seen. But the status quo isn't working for anyone. Not developers, not studios, and ultimately, not gamers either.

Want to hear the whole discussion about Microsoft's layoffs, plus stories about tech-adjacent court cases and foreign scam artists? Listen to the complete This Week in Tech episode featuring Leo Laporte, Nicholas de Leon, and Cathy Gellis. Don't miss their insights on tech industry trends, policy implications, and what these changes mean for consumers.